Letter to Robert Dubick About Sexism in the Preface, 1982 January 27

Title

Letter to Robert Dubick About Sexism in the Preface, 1982 January 27

Description

Letter that Gloria Kaufman wrote to Robert Dubick, Dean of Students, regarding sexism in the Preface.
Kaufman mentions an article titled "What To Call Your Prostitute." She also discusses a letter that a female student wrote to the Preface to protest the sexism; the letter, Kaufman says, was intentionally garbled to make the student seem illogical.
Kaufman asks the Dubick why the Preface is allowed to attack women in this manner.

Creator

Kaufman, Gloria

Source

Women's Studies Program Collection, Indiana University South Bend Archives and Special Collections

Date

1982-01-27

Rights

Digital reproductions of archival materials from the Indiana University South Bend Archives are made available for noncommercial educational and research purposes only. The Indiana University South Bend Archives respects the intellectual property rights of others and does not claim any copyright interest for non-university records or materials for which we do not hold a Deed of Gift. It is the researcher’s responsibility to seek permission from the copyright owner and any other rights holders for any reuse of these images that extends beyond fair use or other statutory exemptions. Furthermore, responsibility for the determination of the copyright status and securing permission rests with those persons wishing to reuse the materials. If you are the copyright holder for any of the digitized materials and have questions about its inclusion on our site, please contact the Indiana University South Bend Archivist.

Identifier

WomensStudies_Box1_Folder20_WS019

Text

Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press
3306 ROSS PLACE, N W WASHINGTON, D. C 20008 (202) 966-7783

January 27, 1982

Robert Dubick Dean of Students IUSB South Bend, IN

Dear Bob:
During the fall semester (1981 ), the dignity and perso nhood of more than half the student body was regularly as saulted in pr int on the pages of PREFACE. If our black students had been so attacked by the PREFACE, or if any enthnic or religious group had been even once de­meaned>! am certain your office would not defend suc h attacks by citi ng the First Amendment. Why is it that the Dean of Students does not take it upon himself to prevent regular and base portrayal s of women student as objects designed sexually to service any and every mal e?
I object to such portraya1s as a member of the IUSB community, as a member of the Women's Studies Commit tee, as an Associate of the Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press (WIFP), and as a human being The Women's Studies Committee has put in much time and effort towa rd encouraging older women to enroll at IUSB. How do you thin k t hey 1eel when they read the editorial "What To Call Your Prostitute"? (PREFACE, January 19, 1982.) The stance of the edi tor is clearly that of a mal e (and a sexist one). Ironically his salary and the funds to publish PREFACE come from a student body that is more female than male. vihy should the funds of women students be used continuously to attack them for their gender?
I have received innumerable complaints from women students about PREFACE. When I suggest that they write a letter, they cite the case o Marcia Egan. Marcia wrote a protesting letter to PREFACE last fall, an< it was printed in a deliberately garbled form so that it made no sen se. Students feel, then, that PREFACE will mu t ilate their letters, as it di < Marcia's, and that they do not have access to Letters to the Editor. They have been, in my view, intimidated by the Egan-letter mutilation. As an Associate of WIFP, I attend annual conferences at the National Pr< Club, and I am familiar with many forms of sexist journalism. I have not, however, seen anywhere else such blatant violation of journalist ic standards and traditions as involved in the ·garbling of Marcia Egan's
letter.

In respect to the Egan letter, I must also say that it unfairly presented her as inarticulate and illogical to her own community of schol ars. What was a sensitive and intelligent protest on her part was turned into a public display of "her" stupidity. It was dishonest to print her name after that letter.
Why is PREFACE allowed freely to attack women students (and women in general)? Why is PREFACE allowed to deny access to Letters to the Editor to women students? Who is there in your office who believes the personhood of women students is a matter worthy of concerned acti on ?

Sincerely yours,

Glor ia Kaufman
GK/la

cc: Lester Wolfson Mary Rathburn Donna Kaminski Marcia Egan Walt Collins PREFACE editors Donna Allen D'Ann Campbell Fran Rhome Publication Board Women's Studies Committee
Enclosure

Citation

Kaufman, Gloria, “Letter to Robert Dubick About Sexism in the Preface, 1982 January 27,” IU South Bend Archives Digital Collections, accessed April 26, 2024, https://iusbarchives.omeka.net/items/show/290.